User blog comment:Pawn of Atlas/Important Discussion for Rapture Storyline page/@comment-1500935-20140403184252/@comment-867628-20140405125410

I would say yes; the primary contradiction seems to have been regarding Suchong's death (in particular, the mention of it in Gil Alexander's diary). As the person on the blog posted, the novel seems to "fix" most of the contradictions of Bioshock 2, meaning that the novel could very well be considered canon. Also, Alexander saying Tenenbaum went "mad" doesn't necessarily mean she went insane. Let's remember that this is Rapture we're talking about; as Elizabeth said, "Men like him (Suchong) mistake an ounce of empathy for a pound of science". Tenenbaum growing a conscience and caring for children would certainly have been deemed insane or unusual for a woman of her genius.

It certainly would be easier to know what some of these "Wikia Contributors" are talking about if they used proper English/grammar. Some of these "posts" look like they were written by Splicers.